<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">GtES</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Geothermal Energy Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">GtES</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Geoth. Energ. Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2195-478X</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/gtes-5-1-2017</article-id><title-group><article-title>Regional estimation of Curie-point depths and succeeding geothermal
parameters from recently acquired high-resolution aeromagnetic data of the
entire Bida Basin, north-central Nigeria</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Curie depth and geothermal estimation in Bida Basin, Nigeria}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{L. I. Nwankwo and A. J. Sunday}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Nwankwo</surname><given-names>Levi I.</given-names></name>
          <email>levinwankwo@yahoo.com</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9123-1642</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Sunday</surname><given-names>Abayomi J.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Geophysics, University of Ilorin, PMB 1515, Ilorin,
Nigeria</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Physics Unit, Department of Science Laboratory Technology, Kwara
State Polytechnic, Ilorin, Nigeria</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Levi I. Nwankwo (levinwankwo@yahoo.com)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>24</day><month>March</month><year>2017</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>5</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>1</fpage><lpage>9</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>5</day><month>December</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>28</day><month>February</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>3</day><month>March</month><year>2017</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.geoth-energ-sci.net/5/1/2017/gtes-5-1-2017.html">This article is available from https://www.geoth-energ-sci.net/5/1/2017/gtes-5-1-2017.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://www.geoth-energ-sci.net/5/1/2017/gtes-5-1-2017.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://www.geoth-energ-sci.net/5/1/2017/gtes-5-1-2017.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>A regional estimation of Curie-point depths (CPDs) and succeeding geothermal
gradients and subsurface crustal heat flow has been carried out from the
spectral centroid analysis of the recently acquired high-resolution
aeromagnetic (HRAM) data of the entire Bida Basin in north-central Nigeria.
The HRAM data were divided into
28 overlapping blocks, and each block was analysed to obtain depths to the
top, centroid, and bottom of the magnetic sources. The depth values were then
used to assess the CPD, geothermal gradient, and subsurface crustal heat flow
in the basin. The result shows that the CPD varies between 15.57 and
29.62 km with an average of 21.65 km, the geothermal gradient varies
between 19.58 and 37.25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with an average of
27.25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the crustal heat flow varies between 48.41
and 93.12 mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with an average of 68.80 mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Geodynamic
processes are mainly controlled by the thermal structure of the Earth's
crust; therefore this study is important for appraisal of the geo-processes,
rheology, and understanding of the heat flow variations in the Bida Basin,
north-central Nigeria.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>This study aims at quantitative estimation of regional Curie-point depth
(CPD) and succeeding geothermal structures, namely geothermal gradients and
subsurface crustal heat flow anomalies, in the whole of Bida Basin in
north-central Nigeria using the spectral centroid analysis of the recently
acquired high-resolution airborne magnetic (HRAM) data. The HRAM surveys
were carried out by Fugro Airborne Survey Limited for the Nigerian
Geological Survey Agency (NGSA) between 2004 and 2009. Acquisition,
processing, and compilation of the HRAM data were jointly financed by the
Federal Government of Nigeria and the World Bank as part of the Sustainable
Management for Mineral Resources Project (SMMRP) in Nigeria.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Geological map of
Nigeria showing location of the Bida Basin (after Nwankwo and Shehu, 2009).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.geoth-energ-sci.net/5/1/2017/gtes-5-1-2017-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Several studies have shown that regional magnetic data can be used
extensively to determine the thermal structure of the Earth's crust in
various geologic environments (Spector and Grant, 1970; Bhattacharyya and
Leu, 1975, 1977; Byerly and Stolt, 1977; Blakely and Hassanzadeh, 1981; Okubo
et al., 1985, 2003; Blakely, 1988, 1995; Maus et al., 1997; Tanaka et al.,
1999; Chiozzi et al., 2005; Eppelbaum and Pilchin, 2006; Ross et al., 2006;
Ravat et al., 2007; Trifonova et al., 2009; Gabriel et al., 2011, 2012;
Bansal et al., 2011, 2013, 2016; Nabi, 2012; Hsieh et al., 2014; Nwankwo and
Shehu, 2015; etc.). For example, dominant magnetic minerals in the Earth's
crust pass from ferromagnetic to paramagnetic state at temperature, commonly
called Curie-point temperature (CPT). Magnetite (Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the most
common magnetic material in igneous rocks and has an approximate CPT value of
580 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (Stacey, 1977). At temperature above CPT, the thermal
agitation causes the spontaneous alignment of the various domains in the
mineral to be destroyed (or randomized) to the extent that the ferromagnetic
minerals become totally paramagnetic (Langel and Hinze, 1998).</p>
      <p>Therefore CPD, which is defined as the depth at which CPT is reached within
the subsurface, can be considered as an index of depth to the bottom of
magnetic sources (DBMS) and can consequently be calculated from geo-magnetic
anomalies (Bansal et al., 2011, 2013; Hsieh et al., 2014). However, in some
circumstances DBMS can be caused by contrasts in lithology instead of CPT and
may not necessarily coincide with CPT in detail (Bansal et al., 2011;
Trifonova et al., 2009). For instance, Trifonova et al. (2009) opined that
even if the spectral method provides a good estimate of DBMS there is no
assurance that it represents the CPD. They reasoned that a variety of
geologic reasons exist for truncated magnetic sources that are unrelated to
crustal temperatures; for example, a sequence of relatively non-magnetic
sediments below young volcanic material may limit the depth of magnetic
sources regardless of the CPT, and another reason is the variety of
magnetic minerals like titanomagnetite (Fe<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>Ti<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>).
Titanomagnetite is the most important iron oxide in crustal magnetic sources;
it has a CPT that is strongly influenced by the amount of titanium and ranges
from 150 to 580 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. In some geologic environments, alloys of iron
with CPTs in excess of 620 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C may be significant contributors to
magnetic anomalies. In spite of these limitations, many studies (Tanaka et
al., 1999; Trifonova et al., 2009; Bansal et al., 2011; Hsieh et al., 2014;
etc.) have reasonably used DBMS as an estimate of CPD and therefore serve as
a proxy for temperature at depth. Again, Trifonova et al. (2009) pointed out
that several studies have identified low-titanium titanomagnetite as the
dominant magnetic phase, and CPTs at these depths are estimated to be between
575 and 600 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. This confirms the estimated value of 580 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
by Stacey (1977) as the case in this study. Another important justification
is that DBMS/CPD estimations can similarly be used to complement geothermal
data in regions where deep boreholes are unavailable (Chapman and Furlong,
1992; Ross et al., 2006; Bansal et al., 2011, 2013).</p>
      <p>The Bida Basin is the least studied of all Nigeria's inland frontier basins.
To date, the basin has no information on seismicity, no exploratory wells
have penetrated its sequences, and deep crustal data are limited (Obaje et
al., 2015). Therefore, this present work is expected to
contribute immensely to a better understanding of the geothermal structures
and geodynamic processes in the entire Bida Basin in north-central Nigeria.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Residual total magnetic intensity map of the entire Bida Basin with
superimposed federal survey half-degree sheets and showing major towns flown
over. A constant TMI value of 33 000 nT was removed.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.geoth-energ-sci.net/5/1/2017/gtes-5-1-2017-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Sketch of procedure for achieving overlapping blocks.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.geoth-energ-sci.net/5/1/2017/gtes-5-1-2017-f03.jpg"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Location and geology of the study area</title>
      <p>The Bida Basin (also known as the Middle Niger Basin or Nupe Basin) is an elongated NW–SE-trending depression
perpendicular to the main axis of the Benue Basin of Nigeria. The entire
basin (Fig. 1) is bounded by latitudes 8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>00<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and
10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and longitudes 4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E and 7<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E,
and it covers an area of approximately 90 750 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Azimuthally averaged power spectral plots for blocks 4 and 19.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.geoth-energ-sci.net/5/1/2017/gtes-5-1-2017-f04.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p>The geology of the Bida Basin is believed to be a gentle down-warped shallow
trough filled with Campanian–Maastrichtian marine to fluviatile strata. The
strata are also believed to be more than 300 m thick (Adeleye, 1976). Those
with marine affinity, the limestones, often form cappings (under variable
thickness of laterites) to the means of the basin. Some form prominent
intermediate breaks of slope along the mesa walls. The buried basement
complex probably has a high relief, and the sedimentary formations have been
shown to be about 2 km thick (Obaje et al., 2015) with a constituted
post-tectonic molasse facies and thin marine strata, which are all unfolded.</p>
      <p>The basin might also be regarded as the north-western extension of the Anambra
Basin, which is found in the south-east, both of which were major depocentres
during the second major sedimentary cycle of southern Nigeria in the Upper
Cretaceous (Obaje, 2009).</p>
      <p>The stratigraphy of the basin consists of mainly Patti, Lokoja, and Agbaja
formations (Ikumbur et al., 2013). According to Akande et al. (2005), Patti
Formation is the only stratigraphic unit containing carbonaceous shale in the
basin and is sandwiched between the older Campanian–Maastrichtian Lokoja
Formation – which contains conglomerates, sandstones, and claystones – and the younger
Agbaja Formation, which comprises mostly ironstones.</p>
      <p>Tectonically, rift hypothesis has been proposed as the possible origin and
evolution of the basin (Kogbe et al., 1983). Some researchers have inferred that
the rifting in the basin started in the Upper Cretaceous and that the
process started initially from the Benue Trough in the early Cretaceous and
eventually spread to other rifted neighbouring basins in the Cretaceous
period (Kogbe et al., 1983).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Calculation of Curie-point depth, geothermal gradient, and heat flow</title>
      <p>Calculations of DBMS, which is commonly construed as the Curie-point depth, are made using
diverse methods (Spector and Grant, 1970; Shuey et al., 1977; Bhattacharyya
and Leu, 1975, 1977; Okubo et al., 1985; Tanaka et al., 1999; Maus and Dimri,
1996; Finn and Ravat, 2004; Ravat et al., 2007; Bansal et al., 2013), namely
the spectral-peak method (Spector and Grant, 1970; Shuey et al., 1977), the
centroid method (Bhattacharyya and Leu, 1975, 1977; Okubo et al., 1985;
Tanaka et al., 1999), the scaling spectral or power-law correction method
(Maus and Dimri, 1996), forward modelling of the spectral-peak method (Finn
and Ravat, 2004; Ravat et al., 2007), and the modified-centroid fractal
method (Bansal et al., 2011; Nwankwo, 2015), among others. The conventional
centroid method is used in this work for the reason that it gives better
estimates with fewer depth errors compared to earlier methods (Ravat et al.,
2007).</p>
      <p>The mathematical models of the centroid method are based on the examination
of the shape of isolated magnetic anomalies introduced by Bhattacharyya and
Leu (1975, 1977) and the study of the statistical properties of magnetic
ensembles by Spector and Grant (1970). Blakely (1995) subsequently introduced
power spectral density of total magnetic field, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as</p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>

              <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M27" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="|" close="|"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="|" close="|"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mfenced open="|" close="|"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mfenced close="|" open="|"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are wave numbers in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> direction,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the power spectra of the magnetization, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
is a constant, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are factors for
magnetization direction and geomagnetic field direction, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are depths to bottom and top of magnetic layer
respectively.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>CPD map of the study area.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=298.753937pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.geoth-energ-sci.net/5/1/2017/gtes-5-1-2017-f05.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p>West African Rift System (WARS) and Central African Rift System
(CARS) (after Heine et al., 2013). Red circle indicates position of the Bida
Basin with extensions of inferred major fracture zones – St Paul,
Romanche, and Chain drawn with broken blue lines. These extensions had been
suggested by Ajakaiye et al. (1991).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=298.753937pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.geoth-energ-sci.net/5/1/2017/gtes-5-1-2017-f06.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>If the layer's magnetization, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is a random function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, it
implies that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a constant, and therefore the
azimuthally averaged power spectrum, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="|" open="|"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, would be
given as
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M42" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="|" open="|"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mfenced open="|" close="|"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mfenced open="|" close="|"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        The depth to the top of the magnetic source is therefore derived from the
slope of the high-wave-number portion of the power spectrum as
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M43" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="|" close="|"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the azimuthally averaged power spectrum, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the wave
number (2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is a constant, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
depth to the top of magnetic sources.</p>
      <p>The centroid depth of magnetic sources can also be calculated from the
low-wave-number portion of the wave-number-scaled power spectrum as (Tanaka et
al., 1999)
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M50" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="|" close="|"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is a constant and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the centroid depth of magnetic
sources.</p>
      <p>The depth to the bottom of the magnetic source (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can
subsequently be obtained from the relation (Okubo et al., 1985)
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M54" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        Using the depth to the bottom of magnetic sources (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the
geothermal gradient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) can be estimated as (Tanaka
et al., 1999; Ross et al., 2006)
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M57" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Curie temperature.</p>
      <p>Next, using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the heat flow
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can similarly be estimated as (Okubo et al., 1985)
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M62" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is thermal conductivity. Thermal conductivity of
2.5 W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> as the average for igneous rocks and a
Curie temperature of 580 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (Stacey, 1977; Trifonova et al., 2009)
are used as standard in this work.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Geothermal gradient map of the study area.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=298.753937pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.geoth-energ-sci.net/5/1/2017/gtes-5-1-2017-f07.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Heat flow map of the study area.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=298.753937pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.geoth-energ-sci.net/5/1/2017/gtes-5-1-2017-f08.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Data acquisition and analysis</title>
      <p>The regional airborne magnetic surveys over the entire Bida Basin and
adjoining areas were carried out using 3 Scintrex CS-3 cesium vapour
magnetometers with a data recording interval of 0.1 s by means of fixed-wing
aircrafts. The aircrafts were flown at mean terrain clearance of 80 m with
500 m line spacing and nominal tie-line spacing of 2 km. The flight line
and tie-line trends were 135 and 45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> respectively. The resulting
magnetic data were published as digital half-degree HRAM intensity maps by
the NGSA.</p>
      <p>Forty-three new HRAM maps (sheet number 117–122, 138–143, 159–166,
180–187, 203–208, and 224–229) on a scale of 1 : 100 000, covering a
total area of 130 075 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, were used in this work. All data,
covering the entire Bida Basin and adjoining areas, were procured from NGSA
as a composite residual total magnetic field intensity (RTMI) map (Fig. 2).
Regional correction, which was based on the International Geomagnetic
Reference Field (IGRF – 11) derived to spherical harmonic degree 13, was
carried out by the NGSA prior to the publication of the map.</p>
      <p>The composite residual map was then divided into 28
overlapping square blocks (Fig. 3), for the purpose of spectral analysis.
Each block covers a square area of 200 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 200 km. Since magnetic
source bodies having bases deeper than window length<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> may not be
properly resolved by the spectral method (Shuey et al., 1977), a window length of
200 km is found to be suitable in this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>Results and discussions</title>
      <p>Azimuthally averaged power and wave-number-scaled power spectra for each of
the 28 overlapping blocks were calculated and used to estimate the DBMS, which of course serve as a proxy for
CPDs. As typical examples, blocks 5 and 20 are shown in
Fig. 4. The right-hand side of the figure shows the slope of the
high-wave-number portion of the spectra, which leads to the estimation of the
depth to the top of magnetic sources (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while the left-hand
side shows the slope of the lower-wave-number part of the wave-number-scaled
spectra, which leads to the estimation of centroid depth (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>The estimated results are shown in Table 1. The table shows that the
estimated CPD varies from 15.57 to 29.62 km with an average of 21.65 km.
The CPD isotherm map for the Bida Basin is consequently shown in Fig. 5. CPD
varies greatly with different geological settings (Tanaka et al., 1999; Salk
et al., 2005). Tanaka et al. (1999), after a compilation of CPD results from
several researchers across the globe, inferred that volcanic, tectonic, and
associated geodynamic environments have CPD shallower than 10 km, while CPDs
ranging between 15 and 25 km are as a result of island arcs and ridges, and
deeper than 25 km in plateaus and trenches. Figure 5 also shows that the CPD values in the Bida Basin trend
mostly in the NE–SW direction, with the shallowest portion (less than
15 km) in the north-western part of the basin; the CPD extends and
deepens both north-eastward and south-eastward in the basin, with its deepest depth (about
32 km) in the north-eastern parts.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Estimated Curie-point depths and succeeding geothermal parameters.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Blocks</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Long</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Lat</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Depth to the</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Centroid depth</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Depth to bottom</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Geothermal gradient</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Heat flow</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">top <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (km)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (km)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (km)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.67 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.90 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">22.13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">26.21 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.119</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">65.52 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.119</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.84 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12.80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">24.76 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.036</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">23.43 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.034</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">58.57 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.034</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10.40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">19.58 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.282</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">29.62 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.427</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">74.06 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.427</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.78 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">15.20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">29.62 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.064</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">19.58 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.042</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">48.95 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.042</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.76 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.81 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">17.86 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.234</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">32.47 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.426</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">81.19 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.426</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.34 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.04 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">20.74 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">27.96 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.135</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">69.91 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.135</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.93 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.65 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">18.37 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.122</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">31.57 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.209</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">78.93 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.209</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.49 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.38 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">17.27 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.184</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">33.58 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.359</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">83.96 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.359</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.86 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10.10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">19.34 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.117</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">29.99 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.182</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">74.97 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.182</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.90 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.74 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">18.58 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.242</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">31.22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.406</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">78.04 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.406</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.88 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">16.76 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.140</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">34.61 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.290</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">86.52 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.290</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.47 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.52 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">15.57 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.072</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">37.25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.173</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">93.12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.173</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.43 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.91 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">18.39 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.164</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">31.54 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.281</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">78.85 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.281</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.77 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10.20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">19.63 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.064</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">29.55 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.096</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">73.87 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.096</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.95 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.98 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">23.01 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.202</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">25.21 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.222</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">63.02 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.222</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">13.10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">24.75 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.265</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">23.43 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.251</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">58.56 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.251</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">17</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">15.50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.09</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">29.60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.180</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">19.59 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.119</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">48.99 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.119</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">18</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.98 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">14.60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">28.22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.082</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">20.55 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.060</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">51.38 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.060</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.89 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">13.40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">25.91 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.161</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">22.39 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.139</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">55.96 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.139</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.97 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.89 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">22.81 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.064</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">25.42 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.071</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">63.57 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.071</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">21</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.44 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10.32 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">19.20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.136</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">30.21 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.214</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">75.52 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.214</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.46 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12.00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">22.54 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.220</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">25.73 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.251</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">64.33 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.251</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.66 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">20.54 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.067</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">28.24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.092</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">70.59 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.092</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">24</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.97 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10.50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">20.03 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.206</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">28.96 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.298</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">72.39 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.298</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">25</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.98 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.87 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">21.76 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.140</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">26.65 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.172</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">66.64 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.172</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">26</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12.50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.09</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">23.00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.180</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">25.22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.198</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">63.04 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.198</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">27</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.69 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">24.51 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.089</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">23.66 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.086</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">59.16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.086</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">28</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.72 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">21.68 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.164</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">26.75 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.202</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">66.88 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.202</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col3">Average </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.22 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.43 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.06</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">21.65 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.146</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">27.57 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.198</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">68.80 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.198</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Centre of the blocks; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to
Curie-point depth.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p>Previous studies have shown that two major regional fault lines (namely St
Paul and Romanche) are likely to have traversed the basin; these are
believed to be extensions of the onshore lineaments in West Africa, which are
part of the major weakness in the crust that predates the opening of the
Atlantic Ocean, and were reactivated in the early stages of continental
rifting (Fig. 6) (Ajakaiye et al., 1991; Buser, 1966). Thus, the relatively
low CPD values over the central portion of the basin may be fairly
consistent with probable positions of St Paul and Romanche palaeofracture
zones.</p>
      <p>Table 1 similarly discloses that the geothermal gradients in the basin vary
between 19.58 and 37.25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with an average of
27.25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, while the crustal heat flow varies between
48.41 and 93.12 mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with an average of 68.80 mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Contour
maps for the geothermal gradient and heat flow are shown in Figs. 7 and 8
respectively. The geothermal gradient map also exhibits mostly NE–SW
trending. The observed major trends are similar to the regional trending
faults in the basin. The lowest values for the geothermal gradient were found
in the south-western portion of the basin. The north-westward trend of
gradient increase was found to result in a maximum value of
42 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the north-western part. The minimum heat flow
value required for considerable generation of geothermal energy is
approximately 60 mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas values ranging from 80 to
100 mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and above indicate anomalous geothermal conditions (Jessop
et al., 1976). Crustal heat flow in the basin also exhibits NE–SW trending,
while the derived amounts increase from the central portion towards the
north-west, with maximum values above 90 mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> observed in the
north-central portion. This portion signifies an anomalous crustal thermal
state and, therefore, is recommended for further investigations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p>The newly acquired high-resolution aeromagnetic anomaly data over the Bida Basin,
north-central Nigeria, have been analysed to estimate the Curie-point depths,
geothermal gradients, and near-surface crustal heat flow. The result shows
that the CPD varies between 15.57 and 29.62 km with an average of 21.65 km,
the geothermal gradient varies between 19.58 and 37.25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
with an average of 27.25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the crustal heat flow
varies between 48.41 and 93.12 mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with an average of
68.80 mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Regions are observed in the basin with shallow Curie-point depths (below
15 km) and corresponding high heat flows (above 80 mW m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, thus
suggesting anomalous geothermal conditions (Jessop et al., 1976). Hence,
further detailed studies are recommended in such regions. Finally,
oftentimes, direct crustal temperature measurements may not be too feasible
for regional studies; hence, the derived geothermal gradients suffice for the
entire basin. Moreover, geodynamic processes are mainly controlled by the
thermal structure of the Earth's crust; therefore this study is anticipated
to contribute significantly to the quantitative appraisal of the
geo-processes, rheology, and understanding of the heat flux variations in the Bida
Basin in north-central Nigeria.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p>The data used are not publicly accessible. However, the
data could be obtained from the Abuja office of the Nigerian Geological
Survey Agency, citing High Resolution Aeromagnetic sheet numbers 117–122,
138–143, 159–166, 180–187, 203–208, and 224–229.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p>Levi I. Nwankwo planned the study, and Abayomi J. Sunday carried it out.
Levi I. Nwankwo prepared the manuscript with
contributions from Abayomi J. Sunday.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p>The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The authors are grateful to the Nigerian Geological Survey Agency (NGSA) for
releasing the HRAM data at a subsidized rate and to the University of Ilorin,
Nigeria, for the facilities made available for the research work. The editors
and esteemed reviewers are also acknowledged for their time and constructive
inputs.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Edited by: H. Rüter<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: two anonymous referee</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Adeleye, D.: The geology of the middle Niger Basin, Geology of Nigeria,
Elizabethan Publishing Company Limited, Lagos, 283–287, 1976.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Ajakaiye, D. E., Hall, D. H., Ashiekaa, J. A., and Udensi, E. E.: Magnetic
anomalies in the Nigerian continental mass based on aeromagnetic surveys,
Tectonophysics, 192, 211–230, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Akande, S., Ojo, O., and Ladipo, K.: Upper Cretaceous Sequences in the
Southern Bida Basin, Nigeria, A Field Guidebook: Mosuro Publishers, Ibadan,
2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bansal, A. R., Gabriel, G., Dimri, V. P., and Krawczyk, C. M.: Estimation of
depth to the bottom of magnetic sources by a modified centroid method for
fractal distribution of sources: An application to aeromagnetic data in
Germany, Geophysics, 76, L11–L22, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bansal, A. R., Anand, S. P., Rajaram, M., Rao, V. K., and Dimri, V. P.: Depth
to the bottom of magnetic sources (DBMS) from aeromagnetic data of central
India using modified centroid method for fractal distribution of sources,
Tectonophysics, 603, 155–161, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Bansal, A. R., Dimri, V. P., Kumar, R., and Anand, S. P.: Curie depth
estimation from aeromagnetic for fractal distribution of sources, in: Fractal
solutions for Understanding complex Systems in earth Sciences, edited by:
Dimri, V. P., Springer International Publishing, Switzerland,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24675-8_2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-3-319-24675-8_2</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Bhattacharyya, B. K. and Leu, L. K.: Analysis of magnetic anomalies over
Yellowstone National Park: mapping of Curie point isothermal surface for
geothermal reconnaissance, J. Geophys. Res., 8, 4461–4465, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Bhattacharyya, B. K. and Leu, L. K.: Spectral analysis of gravity and
magnetic anomalies due to rectangular prismatic bodies, Geophysics, 42,
41–50, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Blakely, R. J.: Curie temperature isotherm analysis and tectonic implications
of aeromagnetic data from Nevada, J. Geophy. Res., 93, 817–832, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Blakely, R. J.: Potential theory in gravity and magnetic applications,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Blakely, R. J. and Hassanzadeh, S.: Estimation of depth to magnetic source
using maximum entropy power spectra with application to the Peru-Chile
trench, Geol. Soc. Am. Mem., 154, 667–681, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Buser, H.: Paleostructures of Nigeria and adjacent countries,
Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart, Germany, 1966.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Byerly, P. E. and Stolt, R. H.: An attempt to define the Curie point isotherm
in northen and central Arizona, Geophysics, 42, 1394–1400, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Chapman, D. S. and Furlong, K. P.: Thermal state of continental lower crust,
in: Continental Lower Crust, edited by: Fountain, D. M., Arculus, R., and
Kay, R. W., Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 179–199, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Chiozzi, P., Matsushima, Y., Okubo, V., Pasquale, M., and Verdoya, M.:
Curie-point depth from spectral analysis of magnetic data in central-southern
Europe, Phys. Earth Planet. In., 152, 267–276, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Eppelbaum, L. V. and Pilchin, A. N.: Methodology of Curie discontinuity map
development for regions with low thermal characteristics: an example from
Israel, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 243, 536–551, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Finn, C. A. and Ravat, D.: Magnetic depth estimates and their potential for
constraining crustal composition and heat flow in Antarctica, EOS T. Am.
Geophys. Un., 85, Fall meeting Suppl., Abstract T11A-1236, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Gabriel, G., Bansal, A. R., Dressel, I., Dimri, V. P., and Krawczyk, C. M.:
Curie depths estimation in Germany: methodological studies for derivation of
geothermal proxies using new magnetic anomaly data, Geophys. Res. Abstr.,
EGU2011-6938, EGU General Assembly 2011, Vienna, Austria, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Gabriel, G., Dressel, I., Vogel, D., and Krawczyk, C. M.: Depths to the
bottom of magnetic sources and geothermal prospectivity in southern Germany,
First Break, 30, 39–47, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Heine, C., Zoethout, J., and Muller, R. D.: Kinematics of the South Atlantic
rift, Solid Earth, 4, 215–253, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Hsieh, H., Chen, C., and Yen, H.: Curie point depth from spectral analysis of
magnetic data in Taiwan, J. Asian Earth Sci., 90, 26–30, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Ikumbur, E. B., Onwuemesi, A. G., Anakwuba, E. K., Chinwuko, A. I., Usman, A.
O., and Okonkwo, C. C.: Spectral Analysis of Aeromagnetic Data over Part of
the Southern Bida basin, West-Central Nigeria, Int. J. Fundament. Phys. Sci.,
3, 27–31, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Jessop, A. M., Habart, M. A., and Sclater, J. G.: The world heat flow data
collection 1975. Geothermal Services of Canada, Geotherm. Ser., 50, 55–77,
1976.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Kogbe, C. A., Ajakaiye, D. E., and Matheis, G.: Confirmation of rift
structure along the middle- Niger Valley, Nigeria, J. Afr. Earth Sci., 1,
127–131, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Langel, R. A. and Hinze, W. J.: The magnetic field of the lithosphere: the
satellite perspective, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 429,
157–158, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Maus, S. and Dimri, V. P.: Depth estimation from the scaling power spectrum
of potential field, Geophys. J. Int., 124, 113–120, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Maus, S., Gordon, D., and Fairhead, D.: Curie temperature depth estimation
using a self-similar magnetization model, Geophys. J. Int., 129, 163–168,
1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Nabi, S. H. A.: Curie point depth beneath the Barramiya-Red sea coast area
estimated from spectral analysis of aeromagnetic data, J. Asian Earth Sci.,
43, 254–266, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Nwankwo, L. I.: Estimation of depths to the bottom of magnetic sources and
ensuing geothermal parameters from aeromagnetic data of Upper Sokoto Basin,
Nigeria, Geothermics, 54, 76–81, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Nwankwo, L. I. and Shehu, A. T.: Evaluation of Curie-point depths, geothermal
gradients and near-surface heat flown from high-resolution aeromagnetic
(HRAM) data of the entire Sokoto Basin, Nigeria, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res.,
305, 45–55, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Obaje, N. G.: Geology and Mineral Resources of Nigeria, Lecture Notes in
Earth Sciences, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2009.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Obaje, N. G., Idris-Nda, A., Goro, A. I., Dantata, S. H., Okoro, A. U.,
Akpunonu, E. O., and Jatau, S. B.: New assessment for Central Nigeria's Bida
basin highlights geological prospects, Oil and Gas Journal, 113, 52–59,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Okubo, Y., Graff, R. G., Hansen, R. O., Ogawa, K., and Tsu, H.: Curie point
depths of the Island of Kyushu and surrounding areas, Geophysics, 53,
481–494, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Okubo, Y., Matsushima, J., and Correia, A.: Magnetic spectral analysis in
Portugal and its adjacent seas, Phys. Chem. Earth, 28, 511–519, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Ravat, D., Pignatelli, A., Nicolosi, I., and Chiappini, M.: A study of
spectral methods of estimating the depth to the bottom of magnetic sources
from near-surface magnetic anomaly data, Geophys. J. Int., 169, 421–434,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Ross, H. E., Blakely, R. J., and Zoback, M. D.: Testing the use of
aeromagnetic data for the determination of Curie depth in California,
Geophysics, 71, L51–L59, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Salk, M., Pamukcu, O., and Kaftan, I.: Determination of Curie point dept and
heat flow from magsat data of western Anatolia, Journal of Balkan Geophysical
Society, 8, 149–160, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Shuey, R. T., Schellinger, D. K., Tripp, A. C., and Alley, L. B.: Curie depth
determination from aeromagnetic spectra, Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. S., 50,
75–101, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Spector, A. and Grant, F. S.: Statistical models for interpreting
aeromagnetic data, Geophysics, 35, 293–302, 1970.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Stacey, F. O.: Physics of the Earth, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Tanaka, A. Y., Okubo, Y., and Matsubayashi, O.: Curie point depth based on
spectrum analysis of the magnetic anomaly data in East and Southeast Asia,
Tectonophysics, 306, 461–470 , 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Trifonova, P., Zhelev, Z., Petrova, T., and Bojadgieva, K.: Curie point depth
of Bulgarian territory inferred from geomagnetic observations and its
correlation with regional thermal structure and seismicity, Tectonophysics,
473, 362–374, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Regional estimation of Curie-point depths and succeeding geothermal parameters from recently acquired high-resolution aeromagnetic data of the entire Bida Basin, north-central Nigeria</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">A regional estimation of Curie-point depths (CPDs) and succeeding geothermal
gradients and subsurface crustal heat flow has been carried out from the
spectral centroid analysis of the recently acquired high-resolution
aeromagnetic (HRAM) data of the entire Bida Basin in north-central Nigeria.
The HRAM data were divided into
28 overlapping blocks, and each block was analysed to obtain depths to the
top, centroid, and bottom of the magnetic sources. The depth values were then
used to assess the CPD, geothermal gradient, and subsurface crustal heat flow
in the basin. The result shows that the CPD varies between 15.57 and
29.62 km with an average of 21.65 km, the geothermal gradient varies
between 19.58 and 37.25 °C km<sup>−1</sup> with an average of
27.25 °C km<sup>−1</sup>, and the crustal heat flow varies between 48.41
and 93.12 mW m<sup>−2</sup> with an average of 68.80 mW m<sup>−2</sup>. Geodynamic
processes are mainly controlled by the thermal structure of the Earth's
crust; therefore this study is important for appraisal of the geo-processes,
rheology, and understanding of the heat flow variations in the Bida Basin,
north-central Nigeria.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Adeleye, D.: The geology of the middle Niger Basin, Geology of Nigeria,
Elizabethan Publishing Company Limited, Lagos, 283–287, 1976.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Ajakaiye, D. E., Hall, D. H., Ashiekaa, J. A., and Udensi, E. E.: Magnetic
anomalies in the Nigerian continental mass based on aeromagnetic surveys,
Tectonophysics, 192, 211–230, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Akande, S., Ojo, O., and Ladipo, K.: Upper Cretaceous Sequences in the
Southern Bida Basin, Nigeria, A Field Guidebook: Mosuro Publishers, Ibadan,
2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bansal, A. R., Gabriel, G., Dimri, V. P., and Krawczyk, C. M.: Estimation of
depth to the bottom of magnetic sources by a modified centroid method for
fractal distribution of sources: An application to aeromagnetic data in
Germany, Geophysics, 76, L11–L22, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bansal, A. R., Anand, S. P., Rajaram, M., Rao, V. K., and Dimri, V. P.: Depth
to the bottom of magnetic sources (DBMS) from aeromagnetic data of central
India using modified centroid method for fractal distribution of sources,
Tectonophysics, 603, 155–161, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Bansal, A. R., Dimri, V. P., Kumar, R., and Anand, S. P.: Curie depth
estimation from aeromagnetic for fractal distribution of sources, in: Fractal
solutions for Understanding complex Systems in earth Sciences, edited by:
Dimri, V. P., Springer International Publishing, Switzerland,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24675-8_2" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24675-8_2</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Bhattacharyya, B. K. and Leu, L. K.: Analysis of magnetic anomalies over
Yellowstone National Park: mapping of Curie point isothermal surface for
geothermal reconnaissance, J. Geophys. Res., 8, 4461–4465, 1975.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Bhattacharyya, B. K. and Leu, L. K.: Spectral analysis of gravity and
magnetic anomalies due to rectangular prismatic bodies, Geophysics, 42,
41–50, 1977.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Blakely, R. J.: Curie temperature isotherm analysis and tectonic implications
of aeromagnetic data from Nevada, J. Geophy. Res., 93, 817–832, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Blakely, R. J.: Potential theory in gravity and magnetic applications,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Blakely, R. J. and Hassanzadeh, S.: Estimation of depth to magnetic source
using maximum entropy power spectra with application to the Peru-Chile
trench, Geol. Soc. Am. Mem., 154, 667–681, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Buser, H.: Paleostructures of Nigeria and adjacent countries,
Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart, Germany, 1966.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Byerly, P. E. and Stolt, R. H.: An attempt to define the Curie point isotherm
in northen and central Arizona, Geophysics, 42, 1394–1400, 1977.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Chapman, D. S. and Furlong, K. P.: Thermal state of continental lower crust,
in: Continental Lower Crust, edited by: Fountain, D. M., Arculus, R., and
Kay, R. W., Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 179–199, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Chiozzi, P., Matsushima, Y., Okubo, V., Pasquale, M., and Verdoya, M.:
Curie-point depth from spectral analysis of magnetic data in central-southern
Europe, Phys. Earth Planet. In., 152, 267–276, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Eppelbaum, L. V. and Pilchin, A. N.: Methodology of Curie discontinuity map
development for regions with low thermal characteristics: an example from
Israel, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 243, 536–551, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Finn, C. A. and Ravat, D.: Magnetic depth estimates and their potential for
constraining crustal composition and heat flow in Antarctica, EOS T. Am.
Geophys. Un., 85, Fall meeting Suppl., Abstract T11A-1236, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Gabriel, G., Bansal, A. R., Dressel, I., Dimri, V. P., and Krawczyk, C. M.:
Curie depths estimation in Germany: methodological studies for derivation of
geothermal proxies using new magnetic anomaly data, Geophys. Res. Abstr.,
EGU2011-6938, EGU General Assembly 2011, Vienna, Austria, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Gabriel, G., Dressel, I., Vogel, D., and Krawczyk, C. M.: Depths to the
bottom of magnetic sources and geothermal prospectivity in southern Germany,
First Break, 30, 39–47, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Heine, C., Zoethout, J., and Muller, R. D.: Kinematics of the South Atlantic
rift, Solid Earth, 4, 215–253, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Hsieh, H., Chen, C., and Yen, H.: Curie point depth from spectral analysis of
magnetic data in Taiwan, J. Asian Earth Sci., 90, 26–30, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Ikumbur, E. B., Onwuemesi, A. G., Anakwuba, E. K., Chinwuko, A. I., Usman, A.
O., and Okonkwo, C. C.: Spectral Analysis of Aeromagnetic Data over Part of
the Southern Bida basin, West-Central Nigeria, Int. J. Fundament. Phys. Sci.,
3, 27–31, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Jessop, A. M., Habart, M. A., and Sclater, J. G.: The world heat flow data
collection 1975. Geothermal Services of Canada, Geotherm. Ser., 50, 55–77,
1976.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Kogbe, C. A., Ajakaiye, D. E., and Matheis, G.: Confirmation of rift
structure along the middle- Niger Valley, Nigeria, J. Afr. Earth Sci., 1,
127–131, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Langel, R. A. and Hinze, W. J.: The magnetic field of the lithosphere: the
satellite perspective, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 429,
157–158, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Maus, S. and Dimri, V. P.: Depth estimation from the scaling power spectrum
of potential field, Geophys. J. Int., 124, 113–120, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Maus, S., Gordon, D., and Fairhead, D.: Curie temperature depth estimation
using a self-similar magnetization model, Geophys. J. Int., 129, 163–168,
1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Nabi, S. H. A.: Curie point depth beneath the Barramiya-Red sea coast area
estimated from spectral analysis of aeromagnetic data, J. Asian Earth Sci.,
43, 254–266, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Nwankwo, L. I.: Estimation of depths to the bottom of magnetic sources and
ensuing geothermal parameters from aeromagnetic data of Upper Sokoto Basin,
Nigeria, Geothermics, 54, 76–81, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Nwankwo, L. I. and Shehu, A. T.: Evaluation of Curie-point depths, geothermal
gradients and near-surface heat flown from high-resolution aeromagnetic
(HRAM) data of the entire Sokoto Basin, Nigeria, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res.,
305, 45–55, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Obaje, N. G.: Geology and Mineral Resources of Nigeria, Lecture Notes in
Earth Sciences, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2009.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Obaje, N. G., Idris-Nda, A., Goro, A. I., Dantata, S. H., Okoro, A. U.,
Akpunonu, E. O., and Jatau, S. B.: New assessment for Central Nigeria's Bida
basin highlights geological prospects, Oil and Gas Journal, 113, 52–59,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Okubo, Y., Graff, R. G., Hansen, R. O., Ogawa, K., and Tsu, H.: Curie point
depths of the Island of Kyushu and surrounding areas, Geophysics, 53,
481–494, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Okubo, Y., Matsushima, J., and Correia, A.: Magnetic spectral analysis in
Portugal and its adjacent seas, Phys. Chem. Earth, 28, 511–519, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Ravat, D., Pignatelli, A., Nicolosi, I., and Chiappini, M.: A study of
spectral methods of estimating the depth to the bottom of magnetic sources
from near-surface magnetic anomaly data, Geophys. J. Int., 169, 421–434,
2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Ross, H. E., Blakely, R. J., and Zoback, M. D.: Testing the use of
aeromagnetic data for the determination of Curie depth in California,
Geophysics, 71, L51–L59, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Salk, M., Pamukcu, O., and Kaftan, I.: Determination of Curie point dept and
heat flow from magsat data of western Anatolia, Journal of Balkan Geophysical
Society, 8, 149–160, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Shuey, R. T., Schellinger, D. K., Tripp, A. C., and Alley, L. B.: Curie depth
determination from aeromagnetic spectra, Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. S., 50,
75–101, 1977.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Spector, A. and Grant, F. S.: Statistical models for interpreting
aeromagnetic data, Geophysics, 35, 293–302, 1970.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Stacey, F. O.: Physics of the Earth, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1977.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Tanaka, A. Y., Okubo, Y., and Matsubayashi, O.: Curie point depth based on
spectrum analysis of the magnetic anomaly data in East and Southeast Asia,
Tectonophysics, 306, 461–470 , 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Trifonova, P., Zhelev, Z., Petrova, T., and Bojadgieva, K.: Curie point depth
of Bulgarian territory inferred from geomagnetic observations and its
correlation with regional thermal structure and seismicity, Tectonophysics,
473, 362–374, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
